Explore

Start with the questions. Go deeper when you need to.

Agalmic Research contains papers, experiments, notes, methods and supporting records. You do not need to understand all of that machinery to find the useful parts.

Current work

What is receiving attention now.

These are the few directions currently being tested or developed.

Active empirical programme · simple boundary rule validated retrospectively

Attention Allocation Under Cognitive Abundance

Study how scarce expert review should be allocated without treating acceptance as ground truth. Historical citation Track A stopped outcome-blind; review hold-outs now show that objective-specific simple rules can outperform more elaborate routing ideas.

Next: Validate the fixed near-boundary rule under sequential review state and per-stratum preservation requirements before considering deployment or learned routing.

Open →

Active practice

Personal Capability Practice

Test whether AI assistance can improve learning and performance in real work while leaving the human able to understand and defend the result.

Next: Run the frozen Cognitive Kernel pilot on matched real-world tasks before adding more intervention machinery.

Open →

Related experiment

Nemosyne / Moneta testbed

Use the independent Nemosyne project for measurable experiments on representation, verification and discovery without absorbing its product roadmap into Agalmic Research.

Next: Run only experiments where the intervention and outcome can be observed and measured, while keeping ownership separate.

Open →

Choose a path

Find the level of detail you want.

Projects

The work in progress

See what is active, what is related, and where each project currently stands.

See projects →

Results

What changed

See findings, negative results, corrections and ideas that became narrower after testing.

See results →

Full record

Browse everything.

The full research record includes notes, drafts, evidence, methods and earlier directions. Use the explorer when you want the underlying detail rather than the short public view.

Abstraction lens

See the whole corpus without carrying all of it at once.

Start with meaningful directions, then widen the lens when you need context, evidence or machinery. Visibility does not imply commitment.

8objects visible
orientationresearch noteactive

The goal is not more ideas

The programme-level aim: improve the distributed capacity to make worthwhile possibilities reachable, recognizable, testable and realizable.

Meaningful direction: Use cognitive abundance to expand reachable worthwhile futures rather than maximizing idea output.

adjacent possiblecognitive toolsselectionrealization

Research Note 001

directionempirical programmeactive

Attention Allocation Under Cognitive Abundance

Study how scarce expert review should be allocated without treating acceptance as ground truth. Historical citation Track A stopped outcome-blind; review hold-outs now show that objective-specific simple rules can outperform more elaborate routing ideas.

Meaningful direction: Validate the fixed near-boundary rule under sequential review state and per-stratum preservation requirements before considering deployment or learned routing.

attentionselectionvalidationpeer reviewcognitive abundanceobservability

Active empirical programme · simple boundary rule validated retrospectively

directionpracticeactive

Personal Capability Practice

Test whether AI assistance can improve learning and performance in real work while leaving the human able to understand and defend the result.

Meaningful direction: Run the frozen Cognitive Kernel pilot on matched real-world tasks before adding more intervention machinery.

capabilityscholarlinesssoftware engineeringleadershiphuman aitransfer

Active practice

directionpossibilityactive

Nemosyne / Moneta testbed

Use the independent Nemosyne project for measurable experiments on representation, verification and discovery without absorbing its product roadmap into Agalmic Research.

Meaningful direction: Run only experiments where the intervention and outcome can be observed and measured, while keeping ownership separate.

representationnemosynemonetarecognitionvisual analytics

Related experiment

evidencenegative resultsupporting

Track A v0.1 pre-outcome feasibility result

The 1,815-candidate ICLR 2020 design passed technical and lineage gates but none of five primary contrasts could resolve the preregistered five-percentage-point effect, so the system stopped before citation outcomes were queried.

Meaningful direction: Use the negative feasibility result to size a genuinely prospective successor rather than weakening the original gate.

attentionselectionprecisionabstainresearch integrity

ABSTAIN_PRE_OUTCOME · citation outcome sealed

evidencefeasibility resultsupporting

Track A v0.2 source-feasibility result

Verified neutral/pre-review 2018–2020 sources plus an optimistic perfect 2017 upper bound reach only 4,502 candidates, below the 4,600 exact-observable target; the convenient ICLR 2021 reviewed-version route is perfectly selection-linked and inadmissible.

Meaningful direction: Recover a selection-neutral additional cohort before another bulk acquisition campaign.

attentionhistorical provenanceselection biassource feasibility

Source gate closed · neutral cohort required

methodhandoff indexactive

Knowledge Handoff Terminus

The boundary of the current project's authority: questions and artefacts that are ready to move toward missing expertise rather than accumulate more local elaboration.

Meaningful direction: Make missing authority and next required expertise visible as a first-class research state.

epistemic handoffexpertisevalidationcollaboration

Open handoffs

Supporting records

Methods and history stay available.

For scrutiny, reuse and reproducibility, the site keeps its methods, prior-art work and provenance records public. These support the research without needing to dominate the main navigation.